Webster’s New World
Dictionary. 3rd College Edition,
1993: Definition of “
pervert”:
“To cause to turn from what is considered right, good or true, misdirect,
lead astray, corrupt, distort, twist.”
1.
PERVERTING THE DEITY OF CHRIST:
1 Timothy 3:16: KJV
renders it: “Great is the mystery of
godliness.
GOD was manifest in the flesh.....”
But the New International says,
He appeared in a body.....”
So? Haven’t we all appeared in a body? The deity of Christ could not have
been more deftly or wickedly circumvented?
2.
PERVERTING THE VIRGIN BIRTH:
Luke 2:33 in the KJV says, “And JOSEPH and his mother marveled at those things
which were spoken of Him.”
NIV: ‘The child’s
FATHER and mother marveled at what
was said about Him.” Reader, was
Joseph really the FATHER of the child Jesus?
Not if you believe Isaiah 7:14; 9:6-7; Matt. 1:16-21; Matt. 1:23 and 1
Tim. 3:16.
3.
OBLITERATING THE BLOOD OF CHRIST:
Col. 1:14 - “In Whom we have redemption through His BLOOD, even the
forgiveness of sins.” says the King
James Version.
BUT IN THE NIV, “through His blood” is deleted, even though Heb. 9:22
clearly states that “without the shedding of blood is no remission.”
4.
ROBBING CHRIST OF
WORSHIP: In each of the following
references, the word “WORSHIP” is deleted from the NIV:
See Matt. 8:2; 9:18; 15:25; 18:26; 20:20, Mark 5-6, 15:19.
Not so with the King James Version.
5.
NIV HONORS LUCIFER:
In Isa. 14:12 NIV reads, “How
you have fallen from heaven, O Morning Star, son of the dawn....”
But the KJV reveals that it is Christ, not Lucifer, who is the morning
star” See
KJV’S
Rev. 22:16..
6.
We’re told that the NIV is easier to read and understand.
But according to a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level research study, the King
James Bible is by far the easiest to understand.
Out of 26 categories, the King James graded easier in 23 of those
categories.
7.
We’re informed by liberals, who are bent on destroying KJV credibility, that
“Older and more reliable manuscripts
have been discovered since the King James Bible.
But Dr. Sam Gipp writes, “The fact is, that the King James translators
had ALL OF THE READINGS available to them that modern critics have available
today.” (“The Answer Book,” Gipp, p.
110).
8.
It is being trumpeted that the
NIV is more accurate. In fact, the
KJB is a literal word for word translation.
When the translators had to add words for sentence structure, they put
them in italics so that it was understood they were interpolated. The NIV used
what translators refer to as “dynamic equivalence.” which allows translators to add, change and subtract to make the
verse say what they “thought” it should.
A word for word translation is far more safer, more reliable, and more
accurate because it follows a disciplined, carefully monitored scholastic
process.
NIV USES THE EDITOR’S PEN TO
WEAKEN LUKE 4:4.
The Lord Jesus,
during His 40 day temptation in the wilderness, quoted Deut. 8:3 to Lucifer,
That verse says, “...to teach you that man does not live on bread alone BUT ON
EVERY WORD THAT COMES FROM THE MOUTH OF THE LORD.” When translating Luke 4;4,
however, the NIV omitted the last half, the most important half, of that verse
in Deut.
Why?
Why the omission? Did the translators actually think the Lord Jesus
couldn’t remember the second half of the verse?
Surely
not!
Then why was it omitted?
One, two, or even three omissions can be excused as oversight,
carelessness, or poor scholarship, but NOT thirty seven!
Look them over:
EDITORS NOTE: From
Europe to the Near East, 95% of the Bibles were based upon the Greek text
known as the Byzantine, Antioch, Textus Receptus, or majority text. The
modern English versions are from the 4th C. text from Alexandria, Egypt. It
reflects what you might expect from the Alexandrian School of philosophers
and Gnostics which is... (1) Jesus wasn't the Christ, (2) Christ didn't
come in the flesh, and (3) Jesus didn't recognize God as his father. (See 1
John 4:3, KJV) Westcott & Hort further perverted the translation and
Modernist Liberals prefer it because that is what they believe. See Gail A.
Riplinger's "New Age Bible Versions" and Les Garrett's "Which Bible Can We
Trust?" and his videos on YouTube, for the overwhelmingly shocking evidence.
The modernists edit verses so that deity is removed and liberal social
issues are protected. The references compare texts side-by-side, and
even show a list of opposites, as well as many hundreds of deletions.
Each update of the NIV has been progressively worst.